Bcc Labor Peace Agreement

Posted: April 8, 2021 in Uncategorized

First, the San Francisco Board of Directors approved amendments to the City`s Police Act on May 24, 2018 to require companies of 10 (10) or more to submit, as part of their application for authorization, either (1) an employment contract signed with a union or (2) a collective agreement signed with a union. Police Code 1602, 1609. Other cities and counties have similar requirements, including the city of Los Angeles. On October 12, 2019, Governor Newsom signed AB 1291, which expanded the demand for a “labour peace agreement.” Under AB 1291, any company with 20 or more employees applying for a licence from the California Bureau of Cannabis Control must “submit a notarized declaration certifying that [it] has already completed or must prove that it has already completed, and comply with the terms of a labour peace agreement.” Any company with less than 20 employees applying for a licence must submit a notarized statement that it will “subscribe and comply with the terms of an employment contract within 60 days of the 20th employee`s employment.” AB 1291 also indicates that the BCC, the Department of Food and Agriculture and the State Department of Public Health may revoke or suspend a licence for non-compliance. Annual licenses – All commercial activities of cannabis are carried out between licensees. There is no specific number limit for licenses that may be held by an applicant. There is no restriction on the types of cannabis licences a person may hold, unless a person holding a test laboratory licence is not authorized for any other commercial activity. An annual licence issued by the Office is valid for 12 months from the date of issuance and may be renewed each year. Since its passage into law, the Medicinal and Adult Use of Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) has required applicants for public cannabis licences of 20 (20) or more to “make a statement that the applicant will make a statement or prove that he has already completed and will comply with the terms of a labour peace agreement.” callus. bus.

Code No. 26015.5 (a) (5) (A). On the face of it, the current state law therefore seems to require agreement and remains silent on the union it is to elect and on the circumstances under which an operator must actually sign a peace agreement in the workplace. This has made many in the industry think that candidates could wait to be approached by a certain union with a reasonable offer. The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60 (2008) is also rich in teachings. In Brown, it was the California Assembly Bill 1889 (“AB 1889”), which prohibits some private employers from using public funds to “support, promote or discourage union organizations.” (Id.

Comments are closed.