Canada Data Transfer Agreement

Posted: September 13, 2021 in Uncategorized

The GDPR maintains the data transmission mechanisms already in place under the Directive (with some minor changes). It also creates a number of new transfer mechanisms that organizations should be aware of. One of the main changes to the Directive is as follows: 49. Consequently, the absence of an answer to that argument in the present proceedings would be such as to encourage the Parliament to challenge the validity of the act with a view to concluding the agreement or, as the case may be, a national court which negotiates with an action brought by a person injured by the transmission of his data to the Canadian competent authority; to request the Court to give a preliminary ruling on the validity of the agreement and the act. The Schrems ECJ said data protection authorities could investigate allegations that an adequacy decision does not offer sufficient protection for the personal data transmitted. Cross-border transfers of data may be made on the basis of the need for transmission for important reasons of public interest. 267. However, like Directive 2006/24, the agreement envisaged does not specify the objective criteria according to which the officials with access to the data must be determined and whether those officials are all employed by the CBSA. That information seems all the more important since the group of officials who have access to that data under Article 9(2) of the envisaged agreement appears to be further than the so-called `limited` group which, in the context of the application of Article 16(2) of this Agreement, may have access to data retained for more than thirty days.

. . .

Comments are closed.